Research

Research

81600 bookmarks
Newest
Risk factors of erectile dysfunction in patients receiving methadone maintenance therapy - PubMed
Risk factors of erectile dysfunction in patients receiving methadone maintenance therapy - PubMed
ED was highly prevalent among male patients on MMT. This suggests that there is a need for routine assessment of sexual function in patients on methadone. Among the risk factors, age was the only factor that was significantly associated with ED. The current use of MMT in Malaysia in terms of dosage …
Risk factors of erectile dysfunction in patients receiving methadone maintenance therapy - PubMed
Female Sexual Dysfunction Among the Wives of Opioid-Dependent Males in Iran - PMC
Female Sexual Dysfunction Among the Wives of Opioid-Dependent Males in Iran - PMC
Opiate abuse in males has significant effects on their sexual functions. In contrast, sexuality in females is a multidimensional issue that can strongly be affected by several factors in their partners. However, only a limited number of studies have ...
Female Sexual Dysfunction Among the Wives of Opioid-Dependent Males in Iran - PMC
prefix - Google Search
prefix - Google Search
Das Präfix, in der traditionellen Grammatik auch Vorsilbe, ist ein unselbständiger Wortteil, der vorne an den Wortstamm angefügt wird. In der deutschen Morphologie finden sich Präfixe in der Wortbildung bei Verben, Substantiven und Adjektiven.
prefix - Google Search
Is routine ophthalmoscopy really necessary in candidemic patients? | PLOS One
Is routine ophthalmoscopy really necessary in candidemic patients? | PLOS One
The purpose of this study was to determine among patients with candidemia the real rate of ophthalmoscopy and the impact of performing ocular assessment on the outcome of the disease. We performed a post hoc analysis of a prospective, multicenter, population-based candidemia surveillance program implemented in Spain during 2010–2011 (CANDIPOP). Ophthalmoscopy was performed in only 168 of the 365 patients with candidemia (46%). Ocular lesions related to candidemia were found in only 13/168 patients (7.7%), of whom 1 reported ocular symptoms (incidence of symptomatic disease in the whole population, 0.27% [1/365]). Ophthalmological findings led to a change in antifungal therapy in only 5.9% of cases (10/168), and performance of the test was not related to a better outcome. Ocular candidiasis was not associated with a worse outcome and progressed favorably in all but 1 evaluable patient, who did not experience vision loss. The low frequency of ophthalmoscopy and ocular involvement and the asymptomatic nature of ocular candidiasis, with a favorable outcome in almost all cases, lead us to reconsider the need for systematic ophthalmoscopy in all candidemic patients.
Is routine ophthalmoscopy really necessary in candidemic patients? | PLOS One
Is routine ophthalmoscopy really necessary in candidemic patients? | PLOS One
Is routine ophthalmoscopy really necessary in candidemic patients? | PLOS One
The purpose of this study was to determine among patients with candidemia the real rate of ophthalmoscopy and the impact of performing ocular assessment on the outcome of the disease. We performed a post hoc analysis of a prospective, multicenter, population-based candidemia surveillance program implemented in Spain during 2010–2011 (CANDIPOP). Ophthalmoscopy was performed in only 168 of the 365 patients with candidemia (46%). Ocular lesions related to candidemia were found in only 13/168 patients (7.7%), of whom 1 reported ocular symptoms (incidence of symptomatic disease in the whole population, 0.27% [1/365]). Ophthalmological findings led to a change in antifungal therapy in only 5.9% of cases (10/168), and performance of the test was not related to a better outcome. Ocular candidiasis was not associated with a worse outcome and progressed favorably in all but 1 evaluable patient, who did not experience vision loss. The low frequency of ophthalmoscopy and ocular involvement and the asymptomatic nature of ocular candidiasis, with a favorable outcome in almost all cases, lead us to reconsider the need for systematic ophthalmoscopy in all candidemic patients.
Is routine ophthalmoscopy really necessary in candidemic patients? | PLOS One
Fungemia by Wickerhamomyces anomalus—A Narrative Review
Fungemia by Wickerhamomyces anomalus—A Narrative Review
Wickerhamomyces anomalus has been previously classified as Hansenula anomala, Pichia anomala, and Candida pelliculosa and was recently reclassified in the genus Wickerhamomyces after phylogenetic analysis of its genetic sequence. An increasing number of reports of human infections by W. anomalus have emerged, suggesting that this microorganism is an emerging pathogen. The present review aimed to provide data on the epidemiology, antifungal resistance, clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of fungemia by W. anomalus by extracting all the available information from published original reports in the literature. PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched for eligible articles reporting data on patients with this disease. In total, 36 studies involving 170 patients were included. The age of patients with fungemia by W. anomalus ranged from 0 to 89 years; the mean age was 22.8 years, the median age was 2.2 years, with more than 37 patients being less than one month old, and 54% (88 out of 163 patients) were male. Regarding patients’ history, 70.4% had a central venous catheter use (CVC), 28.7% were on total parenteral nutrition (TPN), 97% of neonates were hospitalized in the neonatal ICU (NICU), and 39.4% of the rest of the patients were hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU). Previous antimicrobial use was noted in 65.9% of patients. The most common identification method was the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) in 34.1%, VITEK and VITEK 2 in 20.6%, and ID32 C in 15.3%. W. anomalus had minimal antifungal resistance to fluconazole, echinocandins, and amphotericin B, the most commonly used antifungals for treatment. Fever and sepsis were the most common clinical presentation noted in 95.8% and 86%, respectively. Overall mortality was 20% and was slightly higher in patients older than one year. Due to the rarity of this disease, future multicenter studies should be performed to adequately characterize patients’ characteristics, treatment, and outcomes, which will increase our understanding and allow drawing safer conclusions regarding optimal management.
Fungemia by Wickerhamomyces anomalus—A Narrative Review
Just a moment...
Just a moment...
PDF | We report the molecular identifications and antifungal susceptibilities of the isolates causing fungemia collected in the CANDIPOP... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
Just a moment...
Evaluation of Fluconazole versus Echinocandins for Treatment of Candidemia Caused by Susceptible Common Candida Species: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
Evaluation of Fluconazole versus Echinocandins for Treatment of Candidemia Caused by Susceptible Common Candida Species: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of fluconazole and echinocandins in the treatment of candidemia caused by both fluconazole- and echinocandin-susceptible common Candida species. A retrospective study which enrolled adult candidemia patients ≥19 years diagnosed at a tertiary care hospital in the Republic of Korea from 2013 to 2018 was conducted. Common Candida species were defined as C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis. Cases of candidemia were excluded based on the following exclusion criteria: (1) candidemia showed resistance to either fluconazole or echinocandins, or (2) candidemia was caused by other Candida species than common Candida species. In order to compare the mortality rates between patients who receive fluconazole or echinocandins, the propensity scores on variables of baseline characteristics using the multivariate logistic regression analysis were employed to balance the antifungal treatment groups, and a Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed. Fluconazole and echinocandins were used in 40 patients and in 87 patients, respectively. The propensity score matching included 40 patients in each treatment group. After matching, the rates of 60-day mortality after candidemia were 30% in the fluconazole group and 42.5% in the echinocandins group, and a Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed no significant difference between antifungal treatment groups, p = 0.187. A multivariable analysis demonstrated that septic shock was significantly associated with the 60-day mortality, whereas fluconazole antifungal treatment was not associated with an excess 60-day mortality. In conclusion, our study results suggest that fluconazole use in the treatment of candidemia caused by susceptible common Candida species may be not associated with increased 60-day mortality compared to echinocandins.
Evaluation of Fluconazole versus Echinocandins for Treatment of Candidemia Caused by Susceptible Common Candida Species: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis